SBTEXMEDIA
Premium Creative Studio
Loading Experience...
Make.com Scenarios ✦ Content Workflows ✦ Scheduling & Approvals ✦ App Integrations ✦ Fewer Manual Steps
"Automation does not write your content. It removes the twenty small steps between finishing it and getting it out."
SBTEXMEDIA builds social media automation workflows using Make.com, the visual automation platform. The idea is simple: your prepared content lives in one place — a spreadsheet, an Airtable base, a form, a folder — and a single scenario picks it up, formats it for each destination, and carries it through your publishing process without anyone copying, pasting or re-uploading it by hand.
A typical workflow reads like a chain. Content source → Make.com → content processing → supported social platform → publishing or scheduling → tracking and notification. Each link is a step you already perform manually; automation just removes the human keystrokes between them. What the chain looks like in practice depends entirely on your tools, so no two builds are identical.
It is worth being straight about the limits, because a lot of automation marketing is not. Not every social platform allows automated publishing for every account type or post format, and the actions available inside Make.com are set by each platform's own API and by the permissions your account grants. Where direct publishing is not possible, the workflow still does the heavy lifting — preparing, formatting, scheduling and notifying — and leaves you a single confirm step rather than a morning of manual work. I will tell you which parts of your process can be fully automated and which cannot before you commit to anything.
This service pairs naturally with the form and content work SBTEXMEDIA already does. A Jotform or Google Form submission can be the trigger that starts a workflow, and assets produced through graphic design or video editing can be the content the workflow distributes.
Six stages, connected once and then repeated for you. The exact steps are built around the tools you already use.
Read left to right, that is the whole idea. Your content source is wherever the finished material already sits — most often a Google Sheet or an Airtable base, sometimes a form submission or a cloud folder. Make.com watches it, either on a schedule or through a webhook that fires the moment something changes.
Content processing is where the real work happens: filters decide which rows are ready, routers send different content types down different paths, and data mapping reshapes each field into what the destination expects. A caption, an image URL and a publish date go in; correctly formatted payloads come out.
From there the scenario hands off to the platforms your account is connected to and either publishes or schedules, depending on what that platform's integration supports. Finally a notification confirms what went out, and an error path tells you immediately if something did not — which matters far more than it sounds, because the failure mode of a silent automation is content that quietly never publishes.
Supported platforms and actions depend on Make.com integrations, API availability, account permissions and the client's workflow.
A visual automation platform where each workflow is a scenario you can see, open and understand — not a black box only the builder can read.
Make.com represents every workflow as a chain of connected modules on a canvas. That visual model matters more than it first appears: when something changes six months from now, you or your team can open the scenario, see exactly where your content enters and where it leaves, and understand the logic without reading code. Handover is genuinely possible, which is rarely true of automation built in a scripting language.
Five stages, from understanding your current routine to handing you a workflow you can run yourself.
Automation projects go wrong in a predictable way: the scenario is built before anyone has properly mapped what actually happens today, and it automates a process that nobody wanted in the first place. So the first stage is deliberately unglamorous — I want to see your real routine, including the awkward manual step everyone works around.
Anyone publishing regularly enough that the manual steps have become a job in themselves.
The common thread is volume and repetition rather than company size. A solo consultant posting three times a week across two platforms is doing the same copy-paste cycle as a marketing team posting daily across five — the team just feels it sooner. If you can describe your publishing routine as a sequence of steps you repeat every week, that sequence can usually be shortened.
Agencies tend to get the most out of the approval stage, because their bottleneck is rarely writing the content — it is getting the client to confirm it. Creators and personal brands usually want the scheduling and distribution steps. E-commerce businesses most often want product content pulled from an existing catalogue rather than retyped.
Automation improves how efficiently you work. It does not guarantee reach, engagement, followers or sales — and anyone promising otherwise is selling something else.
Every social media automation project includes all of the following — none of it is an upsell.
The questions clients ask before commissioning an automation. For broader questions, see the main FAQ page.
Tell me how you currently create, manage and publish your content, and I'll help you turn the repetitive steps into a streamlined Make.com automation workflow — including an honest assessment of which parts can be automated and which cannot.
"Let's turn your vision into something exceptional — together."
I respond within a few hours. Tell me how your content is created and published today.